Monday, 17 November 2014
Sunday, 9 November 2014
Postmodern film: Maleficent
http://fashionista.com/2014/05/maleficent-makeup-costumes
This article talks about the make-up and costumes that Angelina Jolie wore in the film. It mentions details about specific bits of make-up such as the skin, lips, cheekbones, eyes etc. and tells us how many hours were put in to creating the look. Overall this article gives a good insight into how Angelina Jolie transformed into Maleficent.
Monday, 3 November 2014
Summary of the 3 theorists
Baudrillard
His main theory is about simulacra and simulation. Simulacra
is how society simulates the real. He argues that today there is no such thing
as reality and we are no longer sure what is real and what is not real because
there’s an instability of meaning due to the signs given by the mass media. We
experience everything through the media so we accept things as being real which
in fact may not be real but we perceive it as being real because it has been
presented to us as being the reality. Simulation is the active process of
replacement of the real.
He uses these to explain that we all live in something known as a hyperreality. This is the idea that we are now detaching ourselves from reality and choosing things which make ourselves happy.
Therefore, he is suggesting that we are now losing the ability to make sense of the distinction between the real and the fictional. This however has been criticised as jokes for example only work when people can distinguish between what is real and what is not real.
He uses these to explain that we all live in something known as a hyperreality. This is the idea that we are now detaching ourselves from reality and choosing things which make ourselves happy.
Therefore, he is suggesting that we are now losing the ability to make sense of the distinction between the real and the fictional. This however has been criticised as jokes for example only work when people can distinguish between what is real and what is not real.
Lyotard
Simplifying to the extreme he defines postmodernism as an
‘incredulity towards metanarratives’ which means that totalising stories are
losing importance. He rejects metanarratives, for example he opposes the idea
that everything is knowable by science and that science possesses a higher kind
of knowledge. He argues that theory is never neutral and so scientists have no
more direct access to the truth than philosophers and historians. The
narratives produced by scientists such as research papers and hypotheses are
governed by protocols of the field in which they work in. They are therefore
only exploring within the limits of the system.
He notes that there is no one set of rules, story or condition which can accurately explain knowledge. He believes that everyone has their own perspective so metanarratives should give way to more localised narratives which would address specific events and the diversity of human experience.
He notes that there is no one set of rules, story or condition which can accurately explain knowledge. He believes that everyone has their own perspective so metanarratives should give way to more localised narratives which would address specific events and the diversity of human experience.
Jameson
He argues that postmodernism is a culture of pastiche and
that “stylistic innovation is no longer possible” and “all is left is to
imitate dead styles”. This is arguing that rather than a culture of creativity,
postmodern culture is a culture of quotations of the past and is the imitation
of styles without creating new meanings. He refers to pastiche as being a “blank
parody” without any deep or hidden meanings and says that parody was replaced
by pastiche in the postmodern culture.
He considers totality to still be a valuable idea. He notes that we should try to understand how all the pieces of our world and our experience fit together. This is because knowledge gives us power so the more we understand about our world, the better the choices we make and act upon them to improve our world.
He considers totality to still be a valuable idea. He notes that we should try to understand how all the pieces of our world and our experience fit together. This is because knowledge gives us power so the more we understand about our world, the better the choices we make and act upon them to improve our world.
Saturday, 1 November 2014
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)